|
Post by mullahpaloozer on Jun 10, 2015 18:20:15 GMT -4
repost from PB29 ... thanks
Brigantine God of Diamonds *****
READ MY LIPS - YOU WILL BE PAID WHEN, AND ONLY WHEN, WE HAVE ASSET-BACKED CURRENCY AND A SAFE BANKING SYSTEM TO GO WITH IT.
Please understand that I am NOT the Trustor NOR the Trustee; I have no power to change the Trust's provisions, nor to affect it in any manner. I am simply a stockholder-beneficiary as are each of you. I have no obligation, nor duty to any of you, except the duty and obligation to make this life for me and those I care about (and humanity in general) better, happier, more fulfilling, and more loving - one to all others; in the words of the Declaration of Independence, I have pledged my Life, my Fortune and my sacred Honor to do so.
I happen to believe and embrace the words which appear below my avatar: "All that is required for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing." I have tried to live my life accordingly. And, MLK was quite correct when he said "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." As a result, in no small portion attributable to my direct involvement in CMKX, essentially as a volunteer working off my own wealth, I feel more alive today than at any previous time in my life; in addition, I have learned more about the important things in life in the last ten years, than in the previous 50+.
Just for the record, I'm as sick and tired as all of you about the inordinate time lapse that we have all endured. However, it turns out that the 'cabal' was much more deeply entrenched around the world, especially the western world, than anyone fully appreciated; additionally, the cabal has been willing to do anything and everything imaginable to delay the coming dénouement in hopes of wholly avoiding it. They are responsible for "9/11," which is finally beginning to come to light; they are responsible for the fact that Washington, D.C. has operated our Republic as a corporation for the last 150+ years; they are responsible for hiding all of these facts from you; they are responsible for ISIS; they are responsible for attempting to ignite WWIII; and, they are directly responsible for much much more.
I have done my very, very best to keep you all apprised of the benchmarks of this long and arduous journey. In part, I felt it necessary to do so in recognition of the simple fact that you never purchased your stock with the idea that you were becoming one piece of a huge operation to free the world from centuries of financial slavery. The fact remains that such is the case. You have each played a pivotal role in freeing America, once more. Take pride and joy in such an accomplishment, and look forward to finally receiving your monetary reward with some measure of patience.
Please show compassion and understanding to your fellows - have a loving outlook when you resist the temptation to react with your flight-or-fight response. My very best regards to all.
Blessings, Al Hodges
|
|
|
Post by citybear59 on Jun 10, 2015 20:48:08 GMT -4
Wow, I wonder what happened to the Dinar RV that he referred to not so long ago? Where are the infamous "World Global Settlements" he touted in so many of his "updates"? Sorry but Al Hodges has lost all credibility, not that he ever had any to begin with. My patience for his conspiracy theory driven fairy tales is gone.
The ""Dark Cabal" now is responsible for the 9/11 attacks? How disrespectful for the families of the victims. What next? Bin Laden was a CMKX shareholder? This is absolutely ludicrous.
How anyone can even attempt to defend this outrageous post is beyond me. It proves once and for all that Al has lost his mind.
|
|
|
Post by citybear59 on Jun 12, 2015 20:37:41 GMT -4
I toned down my last post, but the facts remain, NOTHING Al Hodges has said has ever come to fruition. His conversation with Steve (with Dennis as a witness) wherein he explores his theories of aliens (real ET's) infiltrating the Whitehouse and various levels of government is fact. Al subscribes to the conspiracy websites, dinar blogs and two boards that control all posting. Funny.
Sad but the man needs help, or maybe a padded room.
|
|
|
Post by mullahpaloozer on Jun 13, 2015 9:40:51 GMT -4
and Dennis is your witness ... really?
may as well open the door and ask Kevin West, Jim Lowden and the rest of the trustworthy 'EX-CEO' GANG to 'COME ON DOWN!"
maybe send invites to the TYLER GANG!
and speaking of fruition ... definable by degree
Al Hodges' efforts took him/us to the SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES.
TYLER GANG sent us to the corner ... with a 'NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS' commentary.
present management has given us the WEBINAR, by agreement ... a 'cornucopia of insider company information/knowledge/updates/AMAZON portals/etc.' ...
sooooo if ya wanta discuss fruition? ... NAH, been down that road ... BORING!
... be careful what you wish for! ... you may not like what you see!
|
|
|
Post by citybear59 on Jun 14, 2015 4:51:25 GMT -4
Dennis Smith, Al's sidekick and friend was the one present when the discussion regarding aliens cropped up. But that's neither here nor there, people will believe what they want regardless.
Also for the record, I've never said that I'm 100% certain that this company is ever going to be successful, I HOPE Steve is able recover some of our money, but I'm not banking on it either. I have more faith in him however than an attorney with wild conspiracy theories as his basis for his (failed) lawsuit and ludicrous promises of a massive payout.
|
|
|
Post by ines on Jun 19, 2015 16:17:05 GMT -4
millionaires.proboards.com/thread/48729/read-lips?page=17 ( kfl has a legal background ) by KFL 6/19/2015 Hello Ines, I remember meeting you at both the NASDAQ Protest, as well at the Shareholder-Beneficiary Party, which was held at Texas Station Casino in Las Vegas. Glad to learn you are still around. My view of our current circumstances follows: 1. On June 10, 2015, Al Clifton Hodges, Esq. wrote, "I am a simply a shareholder-beneficiary as are each of you." His statement makes clear his state of mind, that all shareholder-beneficiares have equal rights. 2. ACH, Esq. has made numerous written representations that a Trust for the benefit of CMKX/CMKM shareholders, indeed exists. However, he has not disclosed how he has arrived at this conclusion. 3. It is well established that Beneficiaries of a Trust may demand an Accounting of the Trust from their employee, the Trustee. This is an individual right, and may be exercised by any and all Beneficiaries, at their sole discretion. 4. In order for a Beneficiary of a Trust to exercise their individual right to demand an Accounting of the Trust, both the identity of the Trust, and the identity of the Trustee, must be known. 5. Based on my observation, only one shareholder-beneficiary has written of knowledge of the existence of a Trust for the benefit of CMKM/CMKM shareholders. How was this information obtained? If we all are "...simply a shareholder-beneficiary...", why does only one person have knowledge of the existence of a Trust for the benefit of all shareholder-beneficiaries, rather than all shareholder-beneficiaries? 6. ACH, Esq. wrote on June 10, 2015, "READ MY LIPS - YOU WILL BE PAID WHEN, AND ONLY WHEN, WE HAVE ASSET-BACKED CURRENCY AND A SAFE BANKING SYSTEM TO GO WITH IT." (sic). However, he has not disclosed how he arrived at this conclusion, nor has he provided definitions for "we", "asset-backed currency, or "a safe banking system". Further, ACH, Esq. has not disclosed how he can make these written representations with such certainty. Are the foregoing undefined terms, actual conditions precedent delineated in a Trust for the benefit of CMKX/CMKM shareholders? 7. Do one or more "...simply shareholder-benficiaries..." possess exclusive knowledge of the existence of a Trust for the benefit of CMKX/CMKM shareholders, as well as exclusive knowledge of the Trust's terms, and conditions precedent? If so, why? When one wishes to write persuasively, it is fundamental that blanket statements are qualified with the requisite facts to prove the accuracy of the respective statements. An example of this is the use of both footnotes and endnotes in scholarly works, providing the requisite specificity to justify written assertions. No such specificity has been offered to me since I first purchased shares of CMKX/CMKM in February, 2004. Accordingly, my foregoing questions and concerns are logical, reasonable, pertinent and intelligent; I believe all shareholder-beneficiaries share the same questions and concerns. Dennis Smith, a.k.a. "particlewaves" previously referred to the plight of CMKX/CMKM shareholders as a "slog". I suggest to you that said slog has only grown deeper and wider in the subsequent years since he made that written characterization. I am ready to exercise my individual right, to make my personal demand for an Accounting to the unknown Trustee, administering and managing the unknown Trust, that I have been reassured I am a Beneficiary of. Talk about a slog. Have a great weekend, Ines, and thanks for saying hello.
|
|
|
Post by ines on Jun 19, 2015 16:17:27 GMT -4
millionaires.proboards.com/thread/48729/read-lips?page=15smeagle Avatar yesterday at 11:25am smeagle said: Has it ever been explained as to WHY our money got caught up in the Cottrell saga? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Answer by KFL : No. However an undefined, esoteric term "...by attachment..." was proffered, purportedly to justify and allow an unknown/unidentified third-party to both commandeer and divert the funds purportedly for the benefit of CMKX/CMKM bona fide certificate holders. Further, no legal authority was introduced, such as a statute, regulation, treaty, or precedential case law, to allow for said "...attachment...." A trust is administered and managed in accordance with the precise terms and conditions set forth by the Trustor. The Trustee administers and manages the Trust in accordance with these precise terms and conditions, holding a fiduciary responsibility to the Beneficiaries. Upon fulfillment of the conditions precedent delineated in the Trust, the Trustee will supervise the release of the Trust's assets (i.e., the funds purportedly designated for the benefit of CMKX/CMKM bona fide certificate holders). All Trust Beneficiaries have standing to seek an accounting from the Trustee. It is via this right that one or more Beneficiaries can enforce the Trust's terms and hold the Trustee accountable. In the instance of the purported CMKM/CMKX Trust Beneficiaries, this appears to be difficult, as no notice of our purported Beneficiary status has been given. Such notice would include at a minimum, the name of the Trust and the identity(ies) of the designated Trustee(s). If you are interested, the following link provides an educational overview of the subject: www.baskinfleece.com/wp-content/themes/baskinfleecefl/media/holding_the_trustee_accountable.pdfYou asked a very logical, intelligent question, the answer to which I also attempted to have answered via both electronic and telephonic communication. The courtesy of a reply was not forthcoming from ACH, Esq.'s office. In light of the foregoing, the following, logical, intelligent questions exist: 1. If a Trust for the benefit of CMKX/CMKM bona fide Certificates holders exists, why have we not received notice? 2. What are terms, and conditions precedent of the purported Trust? 3. What is the name and contact information for the Trustor(s)? 4. What is the name and contact information for the Trustee(s)? Al Clifton Hodges, Esq. wrote above: "I am simply a stockholder-beneficiary as are each of you." Why has the Trustee(s) provided only ACH, Esq. with specific knowledge of the existence of the Trust for the benefit of CMKX/CMKM shareholders? On its face, this appears to be a prima facia case for breach of fiduciary duty by the Trustee(s), by selectively releasing Trust information to only one shareholder-beneficiary.
|
|
|
Post by ines on Jun 19, 2015 16:17:42 GMT -4
by KFL
It appears the Trustee(s) of the purported Trust for the benefit of all CMKX/CMKM shareholder-beneficiaries has/have bestowed special status to ACH, Esq., by disclosing information about the Trust's existence, its terms, and conditions precedent, to only him.
One of the board administrators recent wrote that all shareholders deserve to know the truth of this saga. The vehicle to learn said truth is to demand an Accounting of the Trust from the Trustee(s). This is a well established practice in Trust law and it is an individual right each and every Trust Beneficiary possess.
I would attempt to contact ACH, Esq. myself, but he long ago stopped responding to both my telephonic and electronic communications, in an attempt to discuss the substance of this and my several posts today. In fact, the private phone number I would dial to enable conversations with his Associate, Dennis Smith, was long ago disconnected.
We all deserve the truth, not just ACH, Esq. and I have identified the legal vehicle - exercising our individual right to demand an Accounting of the Trust from the Trustee.
|
|
|
Post by ines on Jun 19, 2015 16:18:00 GMT -4
by kfl millionaires.proboards.com/thread/48729/read-lips?page=16 When an attorney files a Complaint in Federal District Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, require that the attorney that signs the Complaint, attach a separate "Affirmation", wherein she/he attests that to their knowledge and belief, the contents of the Complaint, most importantly, the allegations, are true. When filing a Complaint that petitions the Court to release a Trust to its denoted Beneficiaries, the two most persuasive strategies, in my view, are to specifically identify the Trust in the Complaint, and also attach the Trust as an Exhibit. This allows the Court to review the Trust's terms, and conditions precedent, allowing the Court, at some future point in the litigation, to examine and review if all terms, and conditions precedent have been satisfied, which would allow for the release of the Trust. Via analogy, if you experience discomfort in your mouth, and subsequently visit your dentist, you must open your mouth and allow the dentist to examine the area you are seeking relief for. Similarly, the Federal District Judge can only examine the Trust, if, and only if, the Trust document has been presented for examination and review, before a determination can be made if the petitioned for relief is meritorious. If the Trust is not identified in the Complaint, and, if the Trust document is not annexed as an Exhibit, the Court has no basis to make a determination for the petitioned for relief. Further, the Court may on its own volition, dismiss the Complaint, for failure to provide the Trust document. Additionally, the attorney that signed the Complaint may be the subject of a malpractice suit. Lastly, the attorney runs the risk of censure, fines, suspension or being disbarred, if it is proven that the Trust does not exist, or if the allegations in the Complaint are false. Given these foregoing proscriptions, the logical inference is made that the representations and allegations made in the Complaint, are true and meritorious, regardless if the source of that information is the attorney's review of the Trust document, a conversation with the Trustee, or a myriad of other possibilities that the information was obtained. The Court's practice is to accept the allegations as true, unless the source of same later becomes an issue. Your irrelevant concern is that of a layperson, inexperienced in the ebb, flow and actual practice of litigation.
|
|
|
Post by ines on Jun 19, 2015 16:18:16 GMT -4
by kfl I never left the board, as I continued to read the cornucopia of divergent thoughts from the usual suspects, often shaking my head after reading unsubstantiated, emotional (and sometimes bizarre) claims, that have yet to come to fruition. I will take the high road, and not provide specificity regarding who the usual suspects are. Nevertheless, presuming the repeated representations that a Trust for the benefit of CMKX/CMKM shareholder-beneficiaries are actually true, then it both logically and legally follows that a Trust document must exist. Accordingly, given the legal requirement that a trust document must exist, it logically and legally follows, that the identity of the Trustor, the Trustee, the Beneficiaries, as well as the applicable terms, and conditions precedent, are all recorded therein. Specifically, this means that both JRSwails and KFL, must be listed in the Trust document (of course, not by our screen names, but our legal names listed on our Certificates, and as recorded at Transfer Online). Alas, I have no personal knowledge of the location of the purported Trust document; perhaps a CMKX/CMKM shareholder-beneficiary will come forward and advise of its location. Remember, there is more than one way to skin a cat. I will leave you with two links describing a "Petition for Declaratory Judgement", which maybe, could be, perhaps might be a viable alternative legal route for CMKX/CMKM shareholder-beneficiaries to follow, provided, and only provided, if, and only if, a copy of the actual Trust document (that must exist if the Trust exists), actually exists. Declaratory Judgement: legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/declaratory+judgment Cornell University Law School regarding Declaratory Judgement: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/2202Be well, JR.... millionaires.proboards.com/thread/48729/read-lips?page=16
|
|
|
Post by citybear59 on Jun 20, 2015 7:02:52 GMT -4
With all due respect Ines and to KFL, more gibberish. The "trust" is a masterful piece of fiction but has no basis in reality. Those holding onto the hope of a massive payout based on Al Hodges claims are going to be sorely disappointed.
|
|
|
Post by mullahpaloozer on Jun 21, 2015 20:59:33 GMT -4
repost from PB29 ... thanks
imSINGLEruRICH Diamond Wiz (Moderator) *****
seagull Mini Mod
an old post from last summer I found on Tramp's board ..
Aug 21, 2014 at 6:00pm @taildrager said:
Mr Briwadd,
There is no better way to put into words than what was just said by Grease TX, we are both in
touch with many people including Al, and Al told me years ago and I left it at that
our stock is being used as leverage and to help humanity, and if we were paid prior
to the new financial system you would not be getting rewarded for the delay and
your funds will be safe when you receive them.
Most are confused and or do not want to believe that Al won that day, and we
were to be paid, but this is bigger than CMKX will ever be, Robert Maheau had a
plan and has been at it for years until his passing where others are now in charge
to take this planet back, just like the new financial system more and more
countries have decided not to continue with a system that is operated by a few
elite that manipulate the planet financially as well as wanting to control more than
just the dollar.... they want total control over us.
With people like Robert Maheau, and Mr Hodges we should be so blessed,
granted we haven't seen our ROI, but again think about it. You invested in a
penny stock and today the pennies have grown expediently to benefit all
mankind.
If you have been following world news, you can see that many countries are all
coming together as a new asset backed system emerges, many are going to jail,
hence the foot always in the isle.
We are are in this together, and instead of pointing the finger at Mr Hodges, you
should write him an apology, and let him know you understand his reasoning's for
his confidentiality and besides he doesn't represent us, we are not the plaintiffs. So
he owes us absolutely nothing, but with his graciousness we will be at the bank
some day soon.
|
|
|
Post by citybear59 on Jun 22, 2015 6:09:38 GMT -4
Absolutely hilarious, what wonderful nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by ines on Jun 22, 2015 11:41:30 GMT -4
With all due respect Ines and to KFL, more gibberish. The "trust" is a masterful piece of fiction but has no basis in reality. Those holding onto the hope of a massive payout based on Al Hodges claims are going to be sorely disappointed. I like KFL posts because he has a legal background. I am also sick and tired of story lines being fed to us.. even if your choice is to want to believe there is trust.. after years of waiting.. the story lines keep expanding/twisting/ adding to, time lines keep expanding etc ( no time lines in AH presentation really ) People questioning validity of any of these story lines. .. that are presented as some kinds of facts ( by AH).. and with certainty, are then being chased away on certain boards.. as ungrateful by certain admins, which of course I find completely wrong, and certainly disservice to shareholders.. So that is the point of KFL posts to be brought here. discussion and as far as it takes one. Your statement that it is masterful piece of fiction certainly can be a conclusion one decides on .. since there is absolutely nothing showing any of us.. providing any evidence or proof so far of its existence and certainly in years that many have been here since there was no distribution of any funds to shareholders. For those that want to hope.. that there might be something .. a trust.. they should also remain vigilant in what is really offered to them. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I am just going to say.. there is a good reason to be vigilant and questioning all the parties in cmkx. Too much unknown, to much hiding in all the areas and all the parties and plenty of space for manipulation from all directions. Including those that claim they are all there is.. stating there was never a trust while hiding the results of our cert pull and their own financial statements ( tyler cmkx ) I do trust that all the shareholders are subject of heavy manipulation and facts/truth evasion by all the parties.. obviously they all have their "good reasons" for maintaining it so.. exactly why there is a reason for shareholders to question everything served in these circumstances.
|
|
|
Post by ines on Jun 22, 2015 12:01:10 GMT -4
Dennis Smith, Al's sidekick and friend was the one present when the discussion regarding aliens cropped up. But that's neither here nor there, people will believe what they want regardless. Also for the record, I've never said that I'm 100% certain that this company is ever going to be successful, I HOPE Steve is able recover some of our money, but I'm not banking on it either. I have more faith in him however than an attorney with wild conspiracy theories as his basis for his (failed) lawsuit and ludicrous promises of a massive payout. Whatever their success is.. I have ZERO trust.. it will ever benefit the shareholders, neither it is their intention to benefit the shareholders. I do however believe they will manipulate the situation and shareholders, exploit them as far as possible, changing the bylaws, evading the truth and information, hiding the true financial statements, for only their benefit.
|
|