|
|
Post by nicholas on Jan 15, 2011 10:45:41 GMT -4
Yep! God forbid if we disagree with this update.  Nicholas There are ways to disagree without being disrespectful. If you can't figure out the distinction, it's probably best to remain silent. C-Dub I'm sorry CDub, but when Al mentioned Tramp's name as being viable I just about spewed my coffee all over my keyboard. I guess now everybody waits till Jan. 21st and then again another date will pass a new date given. These are all my opinions, of course. Nicholas |
|
|
|
Post by Carats4me on Jan 15, 2011 10:58:53 GMT -4
I am really curious to see the reaction of Peter Maheu and Global Intelligence, to their being involved in this saga by Hodges. The veiled or not so veiled accusation that Maheu is holding the payment for us, should be enough in my view (admit, I have no legal expertise) to bring and take legal steps against Hodges. Then, does he have any prove to bring to a court supporting the existence of WGS, CMKX, new currency, etc.  ?? I doubt it very much. I think he put himself in a hot spot. We will se what happens. |
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Jan 15, 2011 11:01:51 GMT -4
I am really curious to see the reaction of Peter Maheu and Global Intelligence, to their being involved in this saga by Hodges. The veiled or not so veilded accusation that Maheu is holding the payment for us, should be enough in my view (admit, I have no legal expertise) to bring and take legal steps against Hodges. Then, does he have any prove to bring to a court supporting the existence of WGS, CMKX, new currency, etc. ?? I doubt it very much. I think he put himself in a hot spot. Wew will se what happens. That was my first thought as well.  |
|
|
|
Post by jack on Jan 15, 2011 13:52:00 GMT -4
First and only warning: ANY disrespect toward Mr Hodges from this point forward will earn the poster a break from the board. Don't test me on this. C-Dub Yep! God forbid if we disagree with this update. Nicholas I did disagree with or rather voiced my thoughts very carefully only to have them twisted and the thread deleted. CW. Just a question do you rule your outside life with such an iron fist? eom due to the fact you will ban me for expressing my thoughts. You do it all the time but no one else is allowed to do so. |
|
frankb
Diamond Explorer
Posts: 84
|
Post by frankb on Jan 15, 2011 13:58:43 GMT -4
Many of the other boards are very mixed as well. I bet Hodges will need an answering service on Monday.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carats4me on Jan 15, 2011 14:40:07 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Jan 15, 2011 20:03:14 GMT -4
Post the letter from the Palace. BookBiz, Hodges refused to provide Tyler with any evidence, and Tyler has none (as they repeatedly said.) Shareholders should press Hodges to share it with Tyler so that Tyler can review it and confirm it with us as you suggest they do. Actually Hodges is only working on one issue...penalties collected. Tyler on the other hand is working on the supposed future of the company. They hired a new COO for goodness sake. What is this man operating? What about the core samples? The new corp merger? The value from the claims sold? There are far more unanswered questions from a seemingly dormant company than there are for Hodges. The focus is clearly in the wrong spot. GM went back to trading already. It's been years...what is Tyler doing? I know there's legal work...many companies have legal work concurrent with actually "doing business." Two rails for this train. One is Tyler and they seem to be getting a free pass on shareholder attention, transparency and accountability. pr Tyler isn't getting a "free pass" on anything. I am sure you read the latest update from them. Knowing how delicately they phrase things, that update was a virtual gold mine of information. Transparancy?! Seriously? Have Hodges provide Tyler with just his letter from the Palace. |
|
|
|
Post by BookBiz on Jan 15, 2011 23:35:41 GMT -4
Potrush, you know I respect you, C-Dub and all the admins on this board. I have been more pro-Tyler than pro-Hodges recently and my reason is as follows...Hodges not only works for the 7 CMKX shareholders in this lawsuit but he is also on the board of Cottrell's World Reports, and while I pray that his allegience is to us, we all know corporate lawyers are paid to "believe" and spread the messages that their companies espouse. I don't know enough about Hodges and his integrity or lack of it but I do know lawyers and many of them will defend something to the death, even if it's not true because that is what they are being paid to do...they can have you believing anything. My reason for having any belief in this fraud payment is from outside sources who have no connection to profits from CMKX. I know of 3 or 4 people in high places who say it is true, so I am counting more on those who will not receive financial benefit than those who will. It will be a disaster if we are being misled in this and I fear for those who are apparently depending on a positive outcome because the rest of their lives is in chaos. God bless us all and I pray for a really good outcome, whatever anyone is saying --- BB
|
|
|
|
Post by theraver on Jan 16, 2011 10:27:29 GMT -4
i have gotten an email from tyler hodges working on 1 thing and tyler is trying to get us back to trading,live in tyler this is what tyler is working on they got the new ceo got back taxes paid and transfer online now working on back to trading go to the web page for cmkx.i agree potrush cant see hodges posting something like on the 14,an atty could get in trouble for making us think 1 thing and its another.
|
|
|
|
Post by BookBiz on Jan 16, 2011 12:46:29 GMT -4
i have gotten an email from tyler hodges working on 1 thing and tyler is trying to get us back to trading,live in tyler this is what tyler is working on they got the new ceo got back taxes paid and transfer online now working on back to trading go to the web page for cmkx.i agree potrush cant see hodges posting something like on the 14,an atty could get in trouble for making us think 1 thing and its another. "an attorney can get in trouble for making us think 1 thing and its another" Sorry, we live in Los Angeles and remember the O.J. trial. Attorneys get paid to make you think something is true, whether or not it is...BB |
|
|
|
Post by Nos ProMod on Jan 18, 2011 18:09:01 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by BookBiz on Jan 18, 2011 18:44:22 GMT -4
If you're really interested...pick up the phone and call for yourself and weigh the tone of the one answering to determine if you believe you're getting a honest answer or a staged reply. In the event that you can't determine that, then choose to wait it out...or, the more novel approach, click delete and walk away. If you're a bonifide shareholder nothing will happen with CMKX without you. What you do need to be especially careful of, should you choose to stay, is the apparent strategy to denigrate the reputation of anyone on the frontline of this adventure. It's the old Saul Alynsky method used in politics. If they can get you to question the mental stability or supposed intention of a person they have demonized, then (they hope) you will disregard any comments made by said person. Let's make them out to be a fool...then what they say by default is deemed foolish. Its quite obvious to many in CMKXnation and frankly is discussed widely and in-depth by mods/admins on several boards and rooms. The focus hasn't been on the actual company in a long, long time. No one here invested in Hodges and Associates. No one here is a plaintiff of Al Hodges. But many here will try to convince you that Hodges, or those he represents are the reason for your frustration, the delays and the "possibility" of loss. Not true. Again I say...whether you subscribe those that remonstrate with vigor that Hodges or Hollenegg are the cause of your discomfort...or the company, which has failed to address its shareholders in months yet hired a COO to operate an apparently non-functioning company is moot: if you're bonifide, then you're not going to miss out, regardless. pr  OK, I think I missed a beat here. What are we talking about? Which phone number? CMKX? Are we now turning our venom on the company instead of Al Hodges? Why do we have to take sides in this? Why can't we all just get along? (to quote a famous LA "historian"). --- BB |
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Jan 18, 2011 19:36:49 GMT -4
If you're really interested...pick up the phone and call for yourself and weigh the tone of the one answering to determine if you believe you're getting a honest answer or a staged reply. In the event that you can't determine that, then choose to wait it out...or, the more novel approach, click delete and walk away. If you're a bonifide shareholder nothing will happen with CMKX without you. What you do need to be especially careful of, should you choose to stay, is the apparent strategy to denigrate the reputation of anyone on the frontline of this adventure. It's the old Saul Alynsky method used in politics. If they can get you to question the mental stability or supposed intention of a person they have demonized, then (they hope) you will disregard any comments made by said person. Let's make them out to be a fool...then what they say by default is deemed foolish. Its quite obvious to many in CMKXnation and frankly is discussed widely and in-depth by mods/admins on several boards and rooms. The focus hasn't been on the actual company in a long, long time. No one here invested in Hodges and Associates. No one here is a plaintiff of Al Hodges. But many here will try to convince you that Hodges, or those he represents are the reason for your frustration, the delays and the "possibility" of loss. Not true. Again I say...whether you subscribe those that remonstrate with vigor that Hodges or Hollenegg are the cause of your discomfort...or the company, which has failed to address its shareholders in months yet hired a COO to operate an apparently non-functioning company is moot: if you're bonifide, then you're not going to miss out, regardless. pr I'm guessing you missed the year end update by the company then. It came out 19 days ago... not exactly months and months. |
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Jan 19, 2011 8:44:59 GMT -4
Oh I haven't missed a beat GOB. Perhaps I wasn't clear in referencing the COO announced months ago. What is that boy operating anyway? pr My understanding is he develops best use for and solicitation of the sales of property recovered by CMKM. Unfortunately, the real estate market is far from fruitful. "boy" That's a bit uncharacteristic of you PR. |
|
??
