|
Post by beckins on Apr 30, 2007 15:10:02 GMT -4
Case 07-A-540161-B Status ACTIVE Plaintiff CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R. Defendant Casavant, Urban Attorney ## Unknown ## Judge Denton, Mark R. Dept. 13 04/25/2007 INITIAL APPEARANCE FEE DISCLOSURE For CMKM Diamonds Inc Filed By CMKM Diamonds Inc 2 pages 04/25/2007 DECLARATION OF DAVID R KOCH IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER For All Parties Filed By CMKM Diamonds Inc 82 pages 04/25/2007 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AFFIDAVIT OF KEVIN WEST IN SUPPORT THEREOF For All Parties Filed By CMKM Diamonds Inc 18 pages courtgate.coca.co.clark.nv.us/DistrictCourt/asp/CaseActivity.asp In United States law, a temporary restraining order (or TRO) may be issued on a short-term basis. TROs usually last until a hearing date for the TRO at which the court decides whether to drop the TRO or to issue a preliminary injunction based on the TRO. Thus, the relationship between a TRO and a preliminary injunction is the same as the relationship between a preliminary injunction and a permanent injunction. "In very rare cases, a TRO may be granted ex parte, i.e. without informing in advance the party to whom the TRO is directed. Usually such ex parte orders are of a short term and are to prevent one's adversary from having notice of one's intentions. Such notice may prohibit the eventual object of the application for an injunction from doing something that would make the court's granting of an injunction fruitless, such as wasting or hiding assets (as often occurs in dissolution of marriage) or disclosing a trade secret that had been the subject of a non-disclosure agreement."
|
|
|
Post by beckins on Apr 30, 2007 15:16:15 GMT -4
ohps....sorry....didnt look far enough down the list..
|
|
|
Post by ines on Jul 31, 2015 11:11:25 GMT -4
Case 07-A-540161-B Status ACTIVE Plaintiff CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R. Defendant Casavant, Urban Attorney ## Unknown ## Judge Denton, Mark R. Dept. 13 04/25/2007 INITIAL APPEARANCE FEE DISCLOSURE For CMKM Diamonds Inc Filed By CMKM Diamonds Inc 2 pages 04/25/2007 DECLARATION OF DAVID R KOCH IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER For All Parties Filed By CMKM Diamonds Inc 82 pages 04/25/2007 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AFFIDAVIT OF KEVIN WEST IN SUPPORT THEREOF For All Parties Filed By CMKM Diamonds Inc 18 pages courtgate.coca.co.clark.nv.us/DistrictCourt/asp/CaseActivity.asp In United States law, a temporary restraining order (or TRO) may be issued on a short-term basis. TROs usually last until a hearing date for the TRO at which the court decides whether to drop the TRO or to issue a preliminary injunction based on the TRO. Thus, the relationship between a TRO and a preliminary injunction is the same as the relationship between a preliminary injunction and a permanent injunction. "In very rare cases, a TRO may be granted ex parte, i.e. without informing in advance the party to whom the TRO is directed. Usually such ex parte orders are of a short term and are to prevent one's adversary from having notice of one's intentions. Such notice may prohibit the eventual object of the application for an injunction from doing something that would make the court's granting of an injunction fruitless, such as wasting or hiding assets (as often occurs in dissolution of marriage) or disclosing a trade secret that had been the subject of a non-disclosure agreement." Some would have you believe that our super powered lawyers could put together an 82 page TRO in just a few days, after several boxes of information just magically appeared on our doorstep. An 82 page TRO is a feat in itself to accomplish that takes time and information to complete. We are in to win. ** just going over some jay adobe posts here is the whole post: By: jay_adobe 13 May 2007, 06:19 PM EDT Msg. 544721 of 779575 Jump to msg. # Some would have you believe that the cert pull was useless and a waste of time, but the handling of money and resources towards the cert pull proves differently. You that have the DD, know that we are in to win. Some would have you believe that we obtained and then just lost 1.9 million acres of the richest land on the face of the earth, rather than have that acreage held safely. Fifteen years of acquiring claims does not just get lost. You that have the DD know about the most prolific diamond field in the world, and we are in to win. Some would have you believe that âs it breaks their heart to hear positive, visionary, forward-thinking information and opinions about our companies, when in reality we all should support the forward movement of the company, and not try to deface or degrade shareholders. We are in to win. Some would have you believe that the entire Casavant family was privy to and part of the demise of our company over years and years, but we that believe in Mr. Casavant do not think that way. Imagine the shear number of people that would have to be in on the demise if it were true. We are in to win. Some would have you believe this is not scripted, that the hearing was legitimate, that we are just struggling to get along day to day. Others believe this plan is brilliant, and we are in to win. Some would have you believe that our super powered lawyers could put together an 82 page TRO in just a few days, after several boxes of information just magically appeared on our doorstep. An 82 page TRO is a feat in itself to accomplish that takes time and information to complete. We are in to win. Some would have you believe that we, as shareholders, are ignorant to the ongoings of everyday life, but we arent a stupid bunch; and we dont like being treated as such. Put out the factual information for all to see. If we can hire lawyers across the country, surely we can hire just one person to scan in the several boxes of papers and put them on the website for the shareholders to view, so that we can make our own decisions. We, from the beginning, are in to win. Some would have you think Mr. Casavant is a crook. He could have walked away a very long time ago, but he didnt. And he didnt for a very good reason. When it was time for him to step down, he did. He could have reverse split our company into oblivion, but he didnt. We are in to win. Some would have you believe that we do not have the pleasure of high-powered people involved in our company. Read the past PRs to see the high-powered peoples names that were/are involved and why. They werent/arent with us for their health or just for fun, thats for sure. We are in to win. Imagine the most prolific diamond field on the face of the earth. Imagine. Just imagine that you, we, bought a piece of that pie..and we are in to win.
|
|
|
Post by citybear59 on Aug 1, 2015 5:29:49 GMT -4
Johnny, aka Jay_Adobe was just another paid pumper, a major part of the fraud perpetrated by Urban and crew. It continues in other forms to this day.
|
|